Product Code Database
Example Keywords: playstation -tekken $9
   » Wiki: Large-calibre Artillery
Tag Wiki 'Large-calibre Artillery'.
Tag

The formal definition of large-calibre artillery used by the Register of Conventional Arms (UNROCA) is ", , , combining the characteristics of a , , mortar, or rocket, capable of engaging surface targets by delivering primarily , with a of and above". This definition, shared by the Arms Trade Treaty and the Treaty on Conventional Armed Forces in Europe, is updated from an earlier definition in United Nations General Assembly Resolution 46/36L, which set a threshold of . Several grammatical changes were made to that latter in 1992 and the threshold was lowered in 2003 to yield the current definition, as endorsed by UN General Assembly Resolution 58/54.

Historically, large-calibre weapons have included bombards and .


Late Middle Ages
In the context of late medieval siege warfare the term superguns applies to stone-firing bombards with a ball diameter of more than . These superguns were either manufactured by forging together longitudinal iron bars, held in place by iron rings, or cast in bronze with techniques generally similar to bell-founding. Known examples include the Pumhart von Steyr, and (all iron) as well as the cast-bronze , and .

At the beginning of the development of superguns was the desire to increase the effect of the projectiles. To this end, master gunners first simply used larger loads. These, however, exerted larger pressure on the existing cannon and could make it burst, causing the death of the irreplaceable gunner with his crew (and even kings). In addition, it was observed that, due to their higher velocity, stone balls were shattered by the impact on the walls rather than smashing them. Thus, the mass of the cannonballs and, consequently, of the ordnance too continually increased, finally culminating in giant cannon like the Pumhart von Steyr which fired a ball. Apart from the anticipated improvement in penetrating power, other factors such as prestige and a potential deterrent effect also played an important role.

For all their manufacturing quality the superguns were only moderately successful. Their military effectiveness turned out to be out of all proportion to their overwhelming logistical demands and financial costs. For the cost of a single supergun, two or three large bombards with a reasonably smaller (in Hauptbüchse) could be produced whose firepower was enough to shatter any medieval wall, in particular when it was concentrated in a battery. Due to their less bulky dimensions and higher rate of fire, these artillery pieces could be more flexibly deployed and caused more destruction in any given length of time. Furthermore, the transition from stone to smaller, but much more devastating iron balls meant that super-sized bores became unnecessary. The caliber of a ball, for example, could be reduced from when using an iron projectile instead.

Thus, as early as the second half of the 15th century, further development in siege technology concentrated on the Hauptbüchse, and bombards largely disappeared from the leading artillery arsenal of the dukes of Burgundy.

At about the same time super-sized bombards were phased out in Western Europe, the technology was transmitted to the Ottoman army by one , a gunfounder, on the occasion of the Siege of Constantinople in 1453.Schmidtchen (1977b), p. 226 The extant Dardanelles Gun, cast by the Ottoman gunfounder Ali several years later, is assumed to have followed closely the outline of Orban's guns. A similar super-sized bombard was employed by the aboard a of possibly Venetian design at the Battle of Zonchio in 1499.

In India, a large forge-welded iron cannon was built during the reign of (1600–1645), and was then one of the largest cannons in the world. Artillery was used by Indian armies predominantly for defending against besieging armies.


Modern weapons
With the new methods and precision engineering of the Industrial Revolution, a revolution in armaments, including took place. In the 1860s, the industrialist Sir William Armstrong, who had already built one of breech-loading artillery pieces, constructed a 600-pounder 'monster gun' of then extraordinary size at the Elswick Ordnance Company in Newcastle. The gun was a rifled muzzle-loader of that fired shells of up to and could pierce of iron armour. Armstrong identified them as "shunt" guns, but they were soon popularly known as "monster" guns.

By the 1880s he had built guns of over in length that could fire shells and punch through an incredible of iron at a range of . The gun was exhibited at the Royal Mining Engineering Jubilee Exhibition held at Newcastle in 1887 for 's golden jubilee.

Prior to World War I, the German military was especially interested in the development of due to the need for the to march past a line of Belgian fortifications constructed specifically to stop such an invasion route. During the opening phases of the war, the Germans employed a (the Big Bertha) and two Skoda Mörser M. 11 mortars to reduce the famous fortresses of Liège and Namur. Their low overland mobility made them arrive later than the infantry at Liège, so several infantry assaults were made with heavy loss of life and generally little success. The guns arrived a few days later and reduced the forts at Liège one-by-one over a short period of a few days.

Larger artillery after this opening period was generally limited to , which had much greater mobility, or naval monitors (two of the British Lord Clive class monitors were fitted with an gun, and HMS General Wolfe fired at a railway bridge in Belgium). All of the major powers involved employed such weapons in limited numbers, typically between although some larger weapons were also used.

The longest-ranged and longest-barreled of the heavy guns deployed in World War I was the , which was used to bombard from a distance of over . The gun had a bore diameter of and a barrel length of . It was fired from concealed fixed positions in the forest of Coucy.

The British attempted to develop weapons to counter the Paris Gun, but none was ready for testing until after the Armistice. A gun under development by for a class of never-built Russian battleships was converted and lined down to , with the designation "8-inch sub-calibre Mark I". The barrel was 120 calibres long. Testing commenced in February 1919, but after only six rounds were fired a crack was discovered, and the gun was scrapped in 1928. DiGiulian, Tony, Britain: 8"/120 (20.5 cm) sub-caliber Mark I A weapon of similar concept, the "8-inch sub-calibre Mark II", was converted from a 12-inch gun (either Mark XI, XI*, or XII), producing a /75 calibre weapon. However, with the war ending before the gun was ready, this weapon was soon scrapped. DiGiulian, Tony, Britain: 8"/75 (20.5 cm) sub-caliber Mark II

Development continued during the inter-war era, although at a more limited pace as were expected to take over in the long-range bombardment role. Nevertheless, the Germans built a handful of powerful Krupp K5s and the largest artillery pieces (by caliber) ever used in combat: the and Dora. The latter had been designed specifically to defeat the , firing a shell to a range of . Although their original role proved unnecessary, Gustav was used successfully to destroy Soviet heavy fortifications, most notably those at . Dora was readied for combat at , but was withdrawn before it could be used. Development might have continued but for the ever-increasing Allied air power, which limited 's options in terms of re-opening bombing attacks on . This led to the development of the V-3 "London Gun" or " Hochdruckpumpe", fired from Mimoyecques in the Pas de Calais, about away. Two attempts to build underground bunkers for the huge weapons were thwarted by massive Royal Air Force bombing raids, which made further attempts futile. Two smaller prototype versions of the gun were used during the Battle of the Bulge.

During World War II, the British developed an experimental 13.5/8 inch hypervelocity gun named Bruce, which was deployed near St Margaret's in among their cross-Channel guns. Sussex History Forum post with material from RMSR War Diary It was intended only for experiments, primarily with smoke shells. These experiments were important in the development of the Grand Slam bomb.Flower, p. 95 It was used from March 1943 through February 1945.


The "Supergun Affair"
Canadian engineer became interested in the possibility of using 'superguns' in place of rockets to insert payloads into orbit. He lobbied for the start of to investigate this concept in the 1960s, using paired ex-US Navy 16"/50 caliber Mark 7 gun barrels welded end-to-end. Three of these 16"/50 (406 mm) guns were emplaced, one in , Canada, another in , and the third near Yuma, Arizona. HARP was later cancelled, and Bull turned to military designs, eventually developing the GC-45 howitzer. Some years later, Bull interested in funding . The objective of this project is not certain, but one possibility is that it was intended to develop a gun capable of firing an object into , whence it could then drop onto any place on the Earth. Gerald Bull was assassinated in March 1990, terminating development, and the parts were confiscated by British customs after the .

It has been suggested that the US Navy had developed a supergun (actually a prototype , known as the Electro-Magnetic Laboratory Rail Gun), capable of shooting shells at or 7 (seven times the speed of sound).


See also
  • List of artillery
  • List of the largest cannon by caliber
  • Super High Altitude Research Project


Reference bibliography

Page 1 of 1
1
Page 1 of 1
1

Account

Social:
Pages:  ..   .. 
Items:  .. 

Navigation

General: Atom Feed Atom Feed  .. 
Help:  ..   .. 
Category:  ..   .. 
Media:  ..   .. 
Posts:  ..   ..   .. 

Statistics

Page:  .. 
Summary:  .. 
1 Tags
10/10 Page Rank
5 Page Refs
2s Time